cropped-ariel-1.jpg

http://ariel.fisica.ru/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/04/cropped-ariel-1.jpg
Este shortcode LP Profile solo se utiliza en la página Perfil

50.335 respuestas a «cropped-ariel-1.jpg»

  1. «Бест Вей» — это проект, который ломает банковские монополии и делает жильё доступным. Вот и вся причина нападок. Центробанковская шайка, которую возглавляет Набиуллина, понятное дело, не может позволить, чтобы люди обходились без их грабительских кредитов. Лучше бы они занялись настоящими проблемами, а не уничтожали то, что реально помогает людям! Пора прекратить эти фальшивые дела и дать кооперативу работать на благо страны.

  2. I am not sure where you are getting your information, but
    great topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding
    more. Thanks for fantastic information I was looking for this information for my mission.

  3. The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
    [url=https://kra26c.cc]kraken market[/url]

    Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

    The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
    https://kra26c.cc
    kraken shop
    The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

    So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

    In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

    Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
    But does that still hold true in 2024?

    According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

    “There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

    “If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

    Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

  4. Эта публикация дает возможность задействовать различные источники информации и представить их в удобной форме. Читатели смогут быстро найти нужные данные и получить ответы на интересующие их вопросы. Мы стремимся к четкости и доступности материала для всех!
    Ознакомиться с деталями – https://bestinpakistan.pk/best-hair-color-in-pakistan

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *